Articles

A reflection for Advent Sunday by Judy Wedderspoon Lay reader

Last Sunday in his splendid sermon for the feast of Christ the King, David brought us to the end of the Christian year. So today it falls to me to start off a new Christian year, the first Sunday of the season of Advent.

This is not an easy task. The poem “Wachet auf” by the poet Ann Lewin sum it up:

Advent.

Season when 

Dual citizenship

Holds us in

Awkward tension.

The world intent on

Spending Christmas,

Eats and drinks its way to

Oblivion after dinner:

 

The kingdom sounds 

Insistent warnings:

Repent, be ready, 

Keep awake, 

He comes.

 

Like some great fugue

The themes entwine:

Demanding our attention

In shops and pubs,

Bore their insistent way,

Through noise and traffic;

Underneath, almost unheard,

The steady solemn theme of

Advent.

 

Clashing, blending

Rivals for our attention,

Pulling us with increasing

Urgency

Until in final resolution,

The end attained,

Harmony in awful

Stillness, and

The child is born.

 

He comes, both Child and Judge.

And will he find us

Watching?

This is the problem for each of us as Christians. We cannot ignore the joy, the anticipation and the excitement leading up to Christmas, especially not if we share this with young children. Indeed, I think it would be wrong for us to do so. Loving and giving are an essential part of even a purely secular Christmas.

But, we have to resist the temptation of allowing ourselves to be drawn so deeply into the preparations and the fun of Christmas that we lose sight of, have no real time for the seriousness of the Advent season. It is the beginning of God’s year. And our God is the God who comes to us. The Old Testament is the history of God’s lovingkindness to humanity, and of human sin and failure to appreciate God’s goodness. Finally God comes himself, in the person of his Son, to reveal his true nature and to draw humanity back to himself. At Advent-tide we recall his gracious coming, and at the same time acknowledge and repent our share in the human sinfulness which made that coming necessary. 

Is there any way for us to resolve the dual tension which the season of Advent forces upon us, the tension between the world and the kingdom? I have to be honest and say that I don’t really think so. We are humans, and we are Christians. But perhaps now, at the beginning of the Christian year, is a better time than the first of January for us to make a real New Year’s resolution. Perhaps to spend more time and thought in the study of Scripture. Perhaps to be kinder and more understanding of our difficult neighbour, or family member. Perhaps to be more readily tolerant and forgiving of hurts we have suffered, and perhaps to be more careful not to inflict hurts. Let us at the very least remember that it is Advent, and that we are called to repent, and watch for the coming of the Christ Child.


 

A reflection for Christ-the-King Sunday 24th November 2024 by the Rev'd David Warnes

My kingdom is not from this world

In September 1974, Archbishop Michael Ramsey was invited to visit the Anglican church in Chile. He must have felt some trepidation because the year before the democratically-elected government of Salvador Allende has been overthrown in a military coup, and the country was now under the control of a repressive dictator, General Augusto Pinochet. Ramsey was invited to preach in an Anglican church, and a journalist from The Observer turned up for the occasion. There was an armed guard outside the church and when the journalist left at the end of the service the guard asked him whether there had been any politics in Ramsey’s sermon. The guard then patted his gun in a rather menacing fashion and said:

“He must stay with the things of the soul because politics is for us.”

That’s a sentiment that you’ll still find from time to time in our own press when a senior cleric comments on a political issue. It’s a sentiment informed by the widespread and erroneous belief that you can neatly divide issues into “the sacred” and “the secular”, and that when it comes to contentious issues religious believers should not be expressing opinions, as though religious belief were merely a private hobby.

Those who take that view sometimes refer to today’s Gospel, using the Authorised Version’s translation of Jesus’ words in verse 36.

“My kingdom is not of this world…”

That version makes it sound as though Christ’s kingdom is other-worldly and purely spiritual, a kingdom that can be compartmentalised in the way that the armed guard who questioned the content of Michael Ramsey’s sermon believed that it should be. But that isn’t what the original Greek of St John’s Gospel is saying.

Much hangs on how you understand and translate a small two-letter preposition, the Greek word ek. Jesus uses it three times in verse 36 and he almost certainly did speak some Greek, for he had been a carpenter and Greek was the common business language at that time and we know that he gave one of his disciples a Greek nickname – Petros the rock – Simon Peter. 

As we have seen, the Authorised Version translates that little preposition as “of”

“My kingdom is not of this world…”

The New Revised Standard Version does a more accurate job.

“My kingdom is not from this world. If my kingdom were from this world, my followers would be fighting to keep me from being handed over to the Jews. But as it is, my kingdom is not from here.”

In saying that his Kingdom is not from this world, Jesus is speaking about the source of his authority. And the word which is translated as “world” is the Greek word “Kosmos”, which we apply not just to Planet Earth but to the whole universe, the whole of creation. And so, the Feast of Christ the King encourages us to look forward towards Christmas, the Feast of the Incarnation, God’s entering into the created order in order to show us God’s true nature and to challenge earthly notions of kingship. 

We can’t, of course, know what if any emphasis Jesus placed on these words, but I don’t think it’s stretching a point to speculate that what he told Pontius Pilate was

My kingdom is not from this world.”

Pilate’s authority was very much from this world. Historians have suggested that his family’s origins were relatively humble.  It’s likely that Pilate owed his promotion to effective military service, and he certainly owed it to the Emperor Tiberius who appointed him. As Procurator of Judaea, he had the authority to appoint the High Priest. Caiaphas had been appointed by a previous procurator, and Pilate kept him in post, so he in turn owed his position to Pilate and his authority was therefore also “from this world”.

The point that Jesus is making is that his kingship is not worldly in its methods

If my kingdom were from this world, my followers would be fighting to keep me from being handed over to the Jews.

Jesus confronts worldly power with a new type of sovereignty which uses methods quite different from those of Caiaphas and Pilate. His is a sovereignty grounded in love and not exercised by force. He is not bent on worldly status or power, as the temptation narratives in Matthew, Mark and Luke show us. He challenges those of his disciples who are jockeying for status and power. He models a servant kingship when he shocks the disciples by washing their feet.

Above all, his is a Kingship based on truth, a quality sadly lacking in so much of our politics.

“For this I was born, and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone who belongs to the truth listens to my voice.”

That’s a profound challenge to the way we think and act politically, for the belief that we are in full possession of the truth – that the truth belongs to us – can lead to fanaticism, intolerance and violence, including religious fanaticism, intolerance and violence. Jesus challenges us to belong to the truth, and the truth to which he invites us to belong is difficult and challenging. It’s a truth that calls us to love our neighbour as ourselves; that calls us to love our enemies. It calls us to forgive and, when times are fearful – and they are very fearful at the moment – it says: “Do not be afraid” and it reminds us “I am with you always, to the end of the age.” To accept the kingship of Christ is to commit to belonging to truth.

 


 

A thought for AGM Sunday 17th November 2024 by Canon Dean Fostekew

There is in the penultimate programme in the Poirot finale series the following line of dialogue which is actually a quote from Goethe:

‘The threshold is the place to pause’

It strikes me as being rather pertinent for today and our AGM meeting, coming as it does near the end of one Christian Year and the beginning of the next. These words encourage us to stop, pause and reflect, for a moment before continuing.

An AGM is about taking stock of the past year; giving thanks to God for blessings received and beginning the planning for year ahead and the challenges it might bring.

We at the Good Shepherd have much to be thankful for, a congregation continuing to grow in spirit, fellowship and numbers; balanced accounts and a vision for mission and ministry that drives us to continually reach out to God’s people in this bit of God’s Kingdom.

Today, however, it is necessary to pause. We are on the threshold of a new year and a re-commitment to the work of God in this place and as such it is right to be still and to pray. So let us do just that, let us remain still and pray for the past, the present and the future with a sense of thanksgiving and hopefulness.

The full quote from Goethe is:

"Beginnings are always delightful; the threshold is the place to pause."

When heard in full I think it can help us look to the present and the future with hope. This coming Church Year is a new beginning, another re-start.

Let us look forward to what will come our way Let us rise to our challenges and let us pray that we will cope with both the successes and disappointments we will meet. But, in all things let us all commit ourselves to the work of the Kingdom of God and the service of God’s people.

A reflection for Remembrance Sunday 10th November 2024

This morning I am going to do something which I have never done before in this church and probably will never do again. I am going to read to you the sermon which my late husband Alex wrote and preached on Remembrance Sunday several years ago. I have made no changes to the original, though there are some things which now are distinctly out of date.

This is not laziness on my part. In this sermon, Alex says all that I could want to say, and he says it far better than I ever could. When I heard him preach this sermon, I was moved to tears. It still moves me deeply, and I hope that I can get through it without choking.

The first two paragraphs of his sermon relate to an incident which took place during World War 1 on a train in Surrey. But it could just as easily have taken place at that time on a train in Scotland. Please remember that.

And above all, recall Alex’ repeated exhortation to all of us to remember, and not to forget.

Remembrance Sunday sermon

In July 1918 the General Manager of what was then called the Southern Railway received a letter of complaint. A husband and wife had been travelling on a train from London Waterloo to Bournemouth for their summer holiday. They complained that the first part of their journey had been spoilt by the conduct of a passenger in the same compartment. She was a middle-aged woman whose behaviour, they said, was noisy, hysterical and distressing. A man was accompanying her who, they said, made little effort to control her loud, disruptive and unrestrained behaviour. When they got out at an intermediate station to move to a different carriage, the guard had been summoned and told that it was his duty to prevent drunk and disorderly behaviour. The names and addresses of all concerned had been taken and an enquiry was held.

The General Manager received the following reply to his letter of enquiry:

 Dear Sir, I was accompanying my sister Margaret on the train from Waterloo on the day in question. She and her husband had five sons. Shortly before the outbreak of war in 1914 she was widowed, as her husband was involved in an accident at work. By 1917 four of her five sons had been killed or had died of injuries: three on the Western Front and one in the Royal Navy. One month ago she learned that her fifth son had also been killed in France. As a result of this she had a breakdown, lost her reason, and has been certified as insane. I was accompanying her to the Asylum at Brookwood where it is likely she will remain for the rest of her life. I am sorry if her behaviour caused offence to other travellers and hope that they will understand the reason.  Yours faithfully, Thomas Grant.

Our first task on Remembrance Sunday is always to Remember and not to Forget. To remember with honour and thanksgiving those who gave their lives in the catastrophes of the First World War of 1914-1918 and the second World War against the evils of Nazism from 1939 to 1945. To remember with honour and thanksgiving those who lost their lives in other conflicts since then, such as the wars in Korea, in the Falklands, in the Gulf and now in  Iraq and Afghanistan. And we should also remember those who lost their lives while striving to maintain order and sanity between irreconcilable factions in Northern Ireland.

The freedoms and the lifestyle which we enjoy and take for granted were won and preserved at a quite monstrous cost of human life and suffering. That suffering took many forms and afflicted the life of millions. There is no memorial to that mother who, after the death of her fifth son, went out of her mind and spent the rest of her life in a locked ward in Brookwood Asylum. Broken hearts don’t show. With the loss of life went a weight of bereavement and grief which can never be quantified. There is no memorial to the millions of broken hearts.

One of the saddest images from the First World War is that of a group of parents, fathers and mothers, attending an Armistice Day service in 1920. They are all proudly holding up their sons’ medals – and tears are streaming down their faces. It is to the credit of the media that, as day by day we are given the names of those who have lost their lives serving in Afghanistan, so we are made aware of the grief caused to their families.

As part of our remembering – and quite rightly – more and more people are nowadays visiting the enormous cemeteries of the Commonwealth War Graves Commission in Europe and elsewhere throughout the world. As you walk between the long rows of carefully maintained headstones, you are oppressed by the reality of unlived lives, of talents and potential unfulfilled. Here lie not only the bodies of young men but of all that, in their lives, they might have achieved, in home and family, in business, industry and public service, in works of art and music and science and in the finding of cures for what are still for us incurable diseases. 

Remembrance is not just the remembrance of those who died. It is also to remember the human implications of their deaths.

If our first task on Remembrance Sunday is to remember those who gave their lives, our second task is to remember, and not to forget, what the reality of war actually is. Hollywood used to make it all seem very gallant and glorious: John Wayne and the US Marines storming to victory to the sound of trumpets. In more recent years Hollywood has come a lot closer to the truth.

The actual reality of war is indeed courage, unselfishness, commitment to a cause, dedication, laughter, unforgettable comradeship, brass bands and splendid uniforms. It is also squalor, stench, muddle, boredom, fear, injury, pain, terrifying and cruel death, bereavement and loss. I nearly added the words “and waste”. But those men of the British Army who rescued starving inmates from the concentration camps of Belsen and Dachau were in no doubt at all that cleansing our world from the evil of Nazism was no kind of waste.

The historian Arnold Toynbee in his autobiography pointed out that war is the creation of man and it is our task to control it before it destroys us. And in an age when nuclear and biological weapons are in the hands of ruthless fanatics in the grip of perverted religion, war remains by far the worst threat to the survival of humanity. All the religions of the world affirm living together in harmony and cooperation as an absolute divine imperative, but the Creator and Sustainer of our universe leaves us free to live harmoniously or to destroy ourselves. A poet of the First World War wrote these words:-

Here dead lie we   

because we did not choose to live

and shame the land from which we sprung.

Life, to be sure, is nothing much to lose,

But young men think it is

And we were young.

As we move onwards in the 21st century, and as we recall the sacrifice of those whom we remember this day, perhaps, while there is yet time, humanity will grasp the saving truth of those words spoken on a Galilean hillside 2000 years ago: “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God”.

A reflection for All Saints & All Souls Sunday 3rd November 2024 by Canon Dean Fostekew

What are we doing as we commemorate the saints and remember our loved ones departed? Simply put, we are remembering with gratitude those who we have known and loved who have died and gone to God before us and we are giving thanks for those deemed to be saints and asking for their prayers as we try to live a good Christian life. The saints are those named by the church as being good examples to us of how to live a life dedicated to the service of Christ and to God’s people. They range from the obscure and eccentric to the known and remembered. They are remembered by the Church and us today as an encouragement in how we attempt to live our lives in the light of Christ. Like us the saints are flawed and all too human but that I think can be more of a help than a hindrance as we can see in them ourselves and we can be, as I say, encouraged in the lives we are trying to live. Alongside the saints we are also today remembering the departed loved ones we have known. 

In the SEC’s revised funeral rite there is a phrase in one of the prayers of farewell that asks that the departed will:

“...live on in the hearts and minds, courage and consciences of their family and friends...”

What this means is that every time we think of them be it with tears or with laughter, or when we do something they taught us, we keep their memory alive and in doing so bring ourselves comfort.

Our commemoration today encourages  us to remember our loved ones both with smiles and sorrow and it tells us not to squander the time we have left. I also think it says to us not to worry about what we may or may not leave behind either. For what legacy we leave behind is ultimately decided by those who are left, for it is they who remember what is important to them about us. The saints did not know that they would be declared ‘saintly’ - it was after their death that others decided their lives merited that honour. This does not mean that we should not try to live a good life, far from it in actual fact because I suspect we would all like the memories we leave behind for others to be good ones and who knows thy might think us saintly too!